Previous Next Index Thread
firstname.lastname@example.org (David Bromage) wrote: >Stephen Boursy (email@example.com) wrote: >> No decent provider would even dream of aliasing out a site--such >>censorship is outrageous. >Censorship is where you cancel/block on the basis of content. It is not >censorship fo block on the basis of volume. >Blocking out a site is NOT censorship. A useful analogy is "you have a >right to speak, but that doesn't mean I have to listen". No as correction it should read "you have a right to speak, you do not have a right to PREVENT others from listening, however you have a right not to listen" What is being done is plain and simple censorship of ALL from earthlink. Punish everyone because Chris thinks so. He has been wrong before by the way. This is unacceptable. If you don't wish to take SPAM that is one thing to censor other innocent people who are unaware of the issues is not right or fair. They have paid money to have access to the newsgroups.