Previous Next Index Thread
Previous Next Index Thread
Most of you have by now received the UIUC note that they are reorganizing their computer services and shifting their listserv from one system to another in January. UIUC has been generous with their resources in allowing CuD to use their listserv. We are most appreciative. It has been, and continues to be, my understanding that they will continue to provide the outlet for the mailing list. If, for some reason, UIUC can no longer provide resources, we will make arrangements to minimize disruption to readers. We are very, very, appreciative for the many offers from readers who have offered assistance. There are too many of you to thank individually, but it is re-assuring to know that so many of you are willing to help. That means a lot. There is, however, a deeper issue that the UIUC transition is making us face. At the most conservative estimate, CuD has several hundred thousand readers. Less than one percent are on the mailing list. The rest obtain CuD from Usenet, the various ftp/www sites, public access systems, fidonet, and feeds. The logistics of dealing with bounces, unsubs, and other stuff (we no longer do manual subs) is becoming a horrendous time burden that has, sadly, begun interferring with other duties. I recognize that a mailing list is the only way that many have of receiving CuD. But, it would be useful if the list could be pared down from the current 6,000+ to under 1,000, which was the optimal manageable number. In the past, CuD readers have been helpful and providing useful suggestions, and perhaps readers' collective thinking can come up with some ideas to reduce work load while not disrupting mail service. One suggestion was to begin the mailing list anew by deleting everybody and requiring re-subscriptions. Another was to scrap the list entirely. We considered this a few years ago, but the outcry was immediate and firm: "DON'T!" Any suggestions?? Thanks again for the many, many posts of support. Jim